Tags
civility, debate, feminism, Nasty, nasty woman, nasty women, politics, power, red pill, strength
During the final debate, Trump told Hillary, “You are a nasty woman” after she delivered one of several low blows during the event.
Not surprisingly, women on Twitter took up the torch, claiming if being a nasty woman meant smart, confident, and powerful count them in.
Thing is, he didn’t call her that for being smart, confident, or powerful. He called her that because of her throwing a jab and then expecting to get a pass because she’s a woman.
See if women want equality, and want to “act like men” along with that comes being treated equally. Which means not with kid gloves.
Even as young as preschool one can see that males and females settle disputes differently. Girls shame and ostracize each other, threatening “I won’t invite you to my birthday!” Such spats can go for days. Boys? They whack each other. Somebody “wins” and they are over it
Now don’t get me wrong, I am not saying because preschoolers act this way, adults should. In fact a big part of early social education is teaching children how to not act on their basest natures, but to “be civilized.”
And of course boys especially are taught to never hit or act aggressively toward girls because girls are to be treated differently than boys.
However, this naturally is expected to be a two way street. If girls don’t want to be treated like boys, they historically have been taught in exchange to be polite, ladylike, refined.
Today, if a woman hits a man, yells at him, throws barbs his way, she still expects to be treated, “like a lady.” But guess what? One can’t have it both ways.
Women who demand the equality to act aggressively toward men should expect it to be met with aggression back, just like occurs between two men. That’s equality. Men don’t ignore aggression from another man, why should he from a woman who acts more like an aggressive man than a ladylike woman?
In short, it’s not good to be or act like a “nasty woman.” It’s not powerful, confident, or intelligent. It’s base. It’s low class. It’s embarrassing.
Women who want to be treated with respect and equality are far better to rise above than to stoop low.
It’s one thing to say, “When they go low, we go high.” Quite another to actually walk the talk.
What do you think? Please share in the comments below.
Da truth. Let them who have eyeballs read.
Hillsary is a nasty pice of work. I don’t want to learn any more. However, the women that defended her have given us a clue to where they stand. This election is not over by a long shot and it will get even uglier.
Da truth. Let them who have eyeballs read.
Do they have to point in the same direction? If so, then Hillary won’t be able to
It really does seem that women surf the swamp a lot more readily than men do. And grudges are held much longer by women generally, than they are by men.
Men do not waste energy on holding grudges, generally. To many other things to invest time and energy into.
“Men do not waste energy on holding grudges, generally. To many other things to invest time and energy into.”
Except that Trump DOES hold grudges. Anyone who disagrees with him will receive his immature wrath. Calling names? Preschool stuff.
You got to the heart of it.
Women shame, manipulate, fight by a hundred small cufs for days, weeks, years. And the loser will likely never trust the attacker ever again.
Men? Instantaneous, direct, full bore. Then one taps out and its done. They can then move on and work together, possibly even look out for one another if called for.
Now that comfort and support are off the table and sex is just a one night, maybe a week, transaction, why should men ever interact with a self proclaimed “Nasty Woman.”
Then again I am proud to be an Asshole.
I knew a guy who would treat his girlfriend very rude, but treated me with courtesy/chivalry. Not out of grudge to her (they ended up staying together until death did them part), but out of a very reasonable principle: treat manly women like men and womanly women like women. He didn’t mind his girlfriends modern ways, he just treated her accordingly. Funny 🙂
I do think that nasty woman is smart, confident and powerful. And evil, too.
Trump is a petulant man-child in some ways, but Hillary is evil, through and through. You could tell during the debates that she is not used to being called out on the shenanigans she’s been able to pull all of her life. Trump brought up her incompetence and her corruption (I believe we only know the tip of the iceberg with her) and she looked a little shocked. Nobody is supposed to say that about HER! She’s untouchable! The media fawns over her and covers for her. (We now see how much, thanks to Wikileaks.) I LOVE how blunt he can be with her sometimes. She so richly deserves it!
I am no fan of Trump’s ego or arrogance, but I pray every day that he wins over Hillary. She is frightening beyond words.
Happyhousewifey,
I think that it is the “evil” part that we all have an issue with. What bothers me is, should Trump win, her proponents are not going to be happy at all. I expect them to cause great trouble.
I just tried to go somewhere via my search engine and poll results came up. While the polls look neck and neck, Big is giving Hillary an 84% chance of winning. A lot can happen in two weeks and one of those things is for Hillary’s voters to get complacent and not show.
Several people I talked to mentioned that they think Trump will be murdered if he does get elected. So much for faith in politics eh?
Pingback: Being a Nasty Woman Is Not Good — Notes From a Red Pill Girl | Red Pill Nation
“Nasty woman” is too vague and ambiguous and way too polite of a term. No, I prefer saying “feminist cunt” because it cuts a woman all the way to the bone. As much as I like Trump and even voted for him both in the primary and this election, he never once said anything about rolling back feminism. So whether he or Hillary wins, status quo toxic gynocentrism still stands and MGTOW still grows.
Not smart at all. Unless she finds a die hard beta, she’ll just chase away most men.
Happyhousewifey,
There is always that in the background. What concerns me about the Hillary bunch is that their passions govern them and, as Ben Franklin said, “Passion never governs wisely.”
Powerful men have to hold grudges, and act on those grudges, occasionally at least and with some degree of publicity or they will not remain on top
This is particularly true of men who’s power rests on social status with the public at large.
If they don’t, they will be percivcved as weak and those their social status
“Several people I talked to mentioned that they think Trump will be murdered if he does get elected. So much for faith in politics eh?”
….just hearing someone say this, while disappointing, doesn’t mean it will happen. Don’t you think some of the NRA would like the same for Hillary?” It’s more likely that Trump fanatics will cause disruption than the mainstream voters.
“It’s more likely that Trump fanatics will cause disruption than the mainstream voters”
There are plenty of fanatics on the Left, including those near the establishment Left. Just last week, a Republican office was firebombed. 20 cars were vandalized by a woman who thought their drivers were attending a Trump rally. Wikileaks emails showed that operatives near to the Clinton campaign had plotted to stir up violence at Trump rallies.
For at least the last decade and a half, “progressives” on college campuses have attempted to disrupt speakers whose opinions they didn’t like, steal newspapers whose articles they didn’t like, etc etc.
There have been many cases of campus ‘progressives’ threatening and attacking Israel supporters and Jews.
Yes, there is a growing threat of Brownshirt tactics in America, and about 90% of it comes from the Left. A large portion of these people will be voting for Hillary Clinton.
See my post The United States of Weimar:
http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/52961.html
I agree with David Foster. I’m in mainland Europe and it has been this way for years: the new fascists call themselves anti-fascists. The left is the violent side. Just because it’s said doesn’t mean it will happen, though, that is true.
We may have to agree to disagree. Before I spent 27 years in the Navy, helping to protect our freedom and democracy I spent a couple of years protesting the Vietnam War and Racial discrimination. Left wing? Right Wing? It’s just a label. There are evil people everywhere. This election is horrible. I’ve never seen anything like it. I thought America was coming out of its racist ways, but now I know better. Trump is polarizing our country like back in the 60’s. Racists and women haters will get Trump’s vote. I feel sad that there are so many people who admire him.
I can’t say that I “admire” Trump, but there’s no evidence that he’s a fraction as bad as Hillary. In fact, as the days pass, I am finding myself even warming to him a little. I never thought I’d say that. I’ve always thought he was an obnoxious, arrogant blowhard, but this election is so extraordinary. I am finding myself increasingly able to overlook his many flaws, due to how repugnant his competition is.
We can agree (I am sure) that the press has not been slack in finding out as much dirt as there is on him, but yet, how does it compare to what Wikileaks and undercover reporters like Veritas Project have revealed? (And with more to come?) It was brought up during the last debate–it was Hillary’s people who were trying to incite violence at Trump rallies, and Hillary was still trying to pin the blame all on Trump! Some of the people who were caught on video admitting to what they’ve done for Hillary have ties with Hillary (Bob Creamer–one of the big names connected to some of this scheming and violence–has visited the White House many, many times). Hillary and her people may try to distance themselves from the corruption, but I don’t think it’s going to work. The problem is that a lot of the media is in the tank for her (to the point of having journalists offering to let the campaign EDIT articles before they go to print!). Many “low information voters” watch a little bit of CNN and think they’re being informed, but they’re not. They’re only hearing about how bad Trump is, with all the problems surrounding Hillary either ignored or downplayed. Fortunately, social media does offer some unfiltered news–if places like Facebook allow the content to stay up! LOL!
With all the corruption going on with Hillary’s people, I simply cannot vote for her. Nor will I stay home (which is essentially a vote for her). Trump can be a buffoon sometimes, but I don’t think he has the evil, corrupt soul that she does. I don’t say that lightly–the blatant corruption within the Clinton circle–it’s mind-boggling.
Trump has my vote, and I’m not ashamed of admitting that. Plenty of women and some people of color I know are voting for him too. To try to label this as being just about racism and sexism is beside the point. This is about the character of the candidates: The person who has many flaws (Trump) but is not evil, or the malignantly corrupt and arrogant person who doesn’t give a darn about anything other than power and lining her own pocket (Hillary).
True. This is about more than racism and sexism. It’s also about competency. I just can’t imagine Trump as our Commander in Chief. His knowledge of our military is laughable. No, it’s scary. And I don’t want to even think who would be his Defense Secretary. Ben Carson maybe? But: Can we agree to this: I’ll be damned glad when this election is over. 🙂
So, are you saying that you think Clinton is more competent? What do you think of what Wikileaks has revealed? Her handling of Benghazi? The email server fiasco? The recent leaks about election fraud?
How does any of that, even if 100% true, make Trump competent to be America’s leader and Commander in Chief. You are just choosing the lesser of two evils. We can match one for one candidates’ downsides. How about all the good things Clinton has done for people throughout the years. Especially women and people of color. What has Trump done, except to put unions down and not pay contractors, assault women, hide his tax returns, lie about charities to military veterans, file hundreds of law suits against little people who couldn’t afford to battle him in the courts ……we can go on and on til the 8th. (or is it the 28th)? j/k
I definitely AM choosing the lesser of two evils! The choices this time have been pretty bad.
How much have you even heard much about some of the things I’m talking about? So much of it is not reported on the mainstream television or newspapers. There is what has been proven about Benghazi, the email server, and the rest. Have you been following what’s coming out of Wikileaks? The Podesta emails? It’s pretty hard to ignore all of it and to assume that none of it can be true. People died in Benghazi. Who knows who was put at risk by the classified emails on her server not being secure enough. The corruption and lies go on and on. It seems like what Trump has done is trivial compared to what she has done.
Lifegoeson292 brings up a good point. No one who gets the job will be competent in all areas. I think Donald Trump could put together a better team. The thought of working with Hillary must be a real hrdle for her to put together a team.
As for Secretary of Defense, Obama has mas a mess of the military. I think we need someone old school.
What “good things Clinton has done for people” are you talking about? Which ones that didn’t benefit her or her family personally in one way or another?
She lied to a grieving mother about the circumstances surrounding her son’s death. That is a million times worse than Trump saying someone’s mother must have had nothing to say.
Tax returns mean nothing, unless they have false claims in them. If someone can avoid paying taxes by using the tax laws to their advantage, god bless them. Tax evasion is a whole nother matter.
They both suck.
The Democratic Party has done great harm to low-income African Americans and millions of others: it enables the dysfunction of public schools thru its unwavering support of its teachers’ unions constituency, its refusal to allow school competition, and lately its demand for racial quotas in school discipline.
Yes, FNU, the candidates both suck, but that doesn’t mean the choice isn’t an important one. Captain Sullenberger’s choice of landing in the Hudson River or engaging in an uncertain attempt to glide to an airport was also a choice that sucked, but if he hadn’t promptly decided to do one or the other, then everyone aboard would have died for sure.
I think choosing Hillary Clinton for president…either by explicitly voting for her or by staying home or voting for a third party candidate…is very likely to *foreclose* future choices: Her control of the government machinery, combined with her corrupt nature and her overwhelming media support, would make it virtually impossible for anyone other than a “progressive”-wing Democrat, to ever be elected to the White House.
David Foster said “I think choosing Hillary Clinton for president…either by explicitly voting for her or by staying home or voting for a third party candidate…”
I must disagree to this. I will not be coerced or bludgeoned into supporting any candidate. I can only vote for someone I support. And I can not in good conscience support either of those candidates. They can threaten me or throw me in jail or take away my life, but I will only support those who are worth supporting. Both republicans and democrats fail in that regard.
For those who have not figured it out yet; government is the enemy not some stranger living half way around the globe. Both the democrats and the republicans want to use power to control you.
If you can not identify who is on your side and who is not…. well good luck to you.
You make a good point, except that nothing you’ve said makes Donald Trump qualified to be President.
Lifegoes
#1 the term racist is without meaning. Not wanting to be swamped by people from foreign nations doesn’t make you a racist. You sound like every other HRC concern troll that wanders by
Reality doesn’t support your position about Trump voters. They aren’t all angels but there are a more reports of the left being the aggressors and the DNC organizing the aggression then the other way round. There are more blacks targeting Whites for attacks etc then the other way round. Way more. They also attack women and gays way more and they are DNC voters.
Trump has a better grasp of all topics, including military then any other person running, and in fact has a better grasp of how to deal with foreign powers and ISSI. As in don’t stir other folks kool-aide unless 100% necessar, isolated and destroy IS and let the Russians do the heavy hitting
Currently militany leadership is inept at best. Field grade officers are chosen for their political reliability not their tactical and strategic success.
Trump is over 35, born in the USA. Which makes him qualified according to US Constitution
I think Trump would make a good president, although an unconventional one. I like the idea of not just talking about term limits and getting special interest money, lobbyists, and other forms of influence out of politics. For 20+ years candidates have said this, but I think Trump will actually DO it.
After helping a local candidate with his campaign I saw up close how ridiculously rigged the system is, on all levels. The two parties have been choosing who the candidates will be behind the scenes by turning the money on for their pick and off for everyone else for decades. That money comes with strings attached. So if the party pick has a war chest of several million compared to only thousands a candidate can raise on their own, there’s no contest. What Trump has done is extraordinary, he came from outside, was not the party pick, and yet got the nomination. I don’t know of anyone else who could have accomplished that. I believe that shows he does have what it will take to turn things around and get the country back on track.
My mom also worries for his safety. And indeed he is a target I am sure. As is anyone running for that office. It’s sadly a risk of the job.
I am not a racist or a woman hater and I am voting Trump. As are many people I know. People from all walks of life, with all sort of worldviews. Even lifetime democrats are voting for him. Two people I know who are voting for him are the kindest gentlest people I know, they don’t have an ounce of hate in them. So I think this idea that all of Trumps supporters are “haters” or “degenerates”is simply not true. Perhaps some are, just as some voting for Hillary may not be nice people. But for the most part I think Trump supporters are solid, average Americans who love their country and want to leave it a better place for generations to come.
Trump is over 35, born in the USA. Which makes him qualified according to US Constitution
No, being over 35 makes him eligible to be President. It hardly makes him qualified. If you think Trump knows anything about the military, then you have never served. You probably never lived through the 60’s where Trump would like all of white good old boys to return to.
Lifegoes, Ton is actually a highly skilled combat vet, former Army Ranger and then some.
Well, I’m surprised anyone with that kind of experience would trust Trump to be our Commander in Chief. Maybe Trump will get a qualified SECDEF, maybe one of his loyal experts, Chachi? Rudy? Christi? We’ll be back to doing air raid drills like in the 50’s.
LOL @ I never served. Only 24 years, 12 in specops, 12 in the infantry, most of that in the 82nd with over 10 years of direct action ground combat time, most of that in Iraq and Afghanistan; but I did the war on drugs in Colombia, Somalia, Panama and other less well know missions
No pussy ass post war time for me.
You should know who your talking to; and yeah I am one if those White good old boys you despise.
Go sell your lies somewhere folks are buying
The military is pro Trump. Much more so then the general population.
Every time you type you prove how little you know.
And there is a lot more to the job then commander and chief; like making sure you don’t have to use guys like me unless there is no other option.
Have fun saying President Clinton, and no, the vets are hardly Trump fans. check the polls, not just FOX news.
And you just proved my point Good old white boys love Trump. Still got the sheets, brother?
Or all the vets I know…. even the majority of the non Whitevones…..
Being racist, sexist etc doesn’t make ones arugement any less true.
Nor is their a rational arugement to make for Trump being a racist.
Lifegoes, please refrain from personal barbs. Let’s just stick to the discussion.
This group of vets support Trump: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/veterans-group-makes-a-huge-announcement-about-donald-trump-john-mccain-controversy/
That all he has
Hell Trump isnt a right wing anything. He is a populist. He is pro abortion, pro gay marriage, pro trannys using whatever bathroom they like, pro immigration…. he is pro guns, which isn’t particularly right wing once you think about how many Democratic Congress critters refuse to vote for more gun regulations.
He is populist in the since that he is america 1st in international stuff like trade agreements, foreign policy, and halting mass illegal immigration…. and so was the DNC not so long ago.
http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/military-times-survey-july-donald-trump-hillary-clinton
This article says Trump is up 17 points with veterans: http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2016/10/donald_trump_vs_hillary_clinto_38.html
2 mins on the interwebz, neither source is fox news…..
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/data-points/poll-trump-leads-clinton-among-military-veteran-voters-n643501
I agree with what you are saying in spirit. But there is just too much to lose if the least worst candidate loses. And it really comes down to one entity
The Supreme Court.
Judges NEVER become more conservative after being appointed. They can and in a lot of cases do become more liberal. Two judges told me that many years ago. One a Federal District Court Judge. The second was on the Federal Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. I’ve paid attention ever since, and they were spot on.
My shit list of “Nasty Women”:
1) Hillary R. Clinton
2) Angela Merkel (for RPG’s euro readers out there)
3) Diane Finstein
4) Barbara Boxer
5) Ruth Bader Ginsburg
6) Sonya Sotomayor
7) Lindy West
8) Jessica Valenti
9) Anita Sarkeesian
10) Laci Green
11) Suey Park
12) Jackie Coakley- UVA rape hoax whore
13) Emma “Fuck me in the ass!” Sulkowitz aka Matress Girl
14) Megyn Kelly
15) Zoey Quin- GamerGate whore
Feel free to add to the list if I missed anyone.
I just thought of a few more:
16) Amy Schumer
17) Ellen DeGeneres
18) Oprah Winfrey
19) Rosie O’donnel
20) Every woman on that shit show called The View
21) Ana Casparian from The Young Turks
Again, feel free to add to the list if I missed anyone.
Don’t know how I missed these ones:
22) Lena Dunham
23) Leslie Jones
24) Sarah Silverman
25) Beyoncé
26) Niki Minaj
27) Demi Lovato
28) Miley Cyrus
29) Sandra Day O’ Connor
30) Sarah Jessica Parker
31) Barbara Streisand
32) Rihanna
I mentioned this over at Spawny’s. Trump has promised to sue all his false accusers. I don’t think he is after money. So much for nasty.
lifegoeson, I notice that you never address the many problems surrounding Hillary, which have been well-documented. Her handling of Benghazi. Her fiasco with the email server. Now we have more stuff coming out about the corruption and illegal activity with her campaign. Let’s not even get into what has been uncovered with Wikileaks and the Podesta emails.
You focus so much on why Trump is UNqualified, but why on earth would a woman who has done all the things Hillary has done be considered qualified? She’s a disaster. Let’s be honest here: If Bush or any other Republican politician had done all the things that she had done, the press would have a field day with it and demand that the Republican be held accountable. But I guess some people are more equal than others. The press (and government) just looks the other way when Hillary does all these things.
Let’s be honest: If someone like Trump had done something similar to what happened in Benghazi or screwed up with an email server–if there was even a suspicion of it, you and a lot of other guys would be all over it, expressing outrage and proclaiming that he is terribly unqualified. If Hillary does it? Oh, well! Let’s focus on all the supposed good things she’s done! LOL!
It seems like a lot of Hillary fans want to assume that each and every scandal and negative news story about her must be false, and each and every bad news story about Trump must be true. But, I don’t think the real world works that way.
More Nasty Women:
33) Katy Perry
34) Lady Gaga
35 Hair Hat Hooligan Michelle Obama
More Nasty Women:
36) Azealia Banks
37) Amber Heard
38) Angelina Jolie
39) Jennifer Lopez
40) Lindsey Lohan
41) All the women conveniently accusing Trump of sexual harassment at this moment in time, especially ex porn whore Jessica Drake.
42) Basically, every woman in Hollywood, TV news, and the music business because the entertainment industry’s dirty little secret is EVERYONE IS COMPROMISED ON THE CASTING COUCH!!! Bow chicka wow wow!!
Here’s a little article showing the lies of life goes on and the left
http://www.vdare.com/posts/new-york-times-sheds-crocodile-tears-about-americas-lost-civility
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/trump-track-win-black-votes-gop-candidate-since-1960/
Trumping polling with black folks
Older negros locally can’t stand the hildabeast
San Jose is an absolute shit hole. Never mind that it’s a sausage fest there, but the non-white majority ensures it will end up like Stockton or Oakland. You walk in to any store like Walmart or Costco there and you will be more than likely the only white person there. Glad I left that place back in 2004.
As for the (((New York Times))) it was nice to see Donald naming and shaming them in his most recent rally in Florida.
One more Nasty Woman to the list since mentioning Mexifornia/Calimexico:
Gun Grabbing Nancy Pelosi.
Two more Nasty Women:
Rachel Maddow
Chanty Binx- AKA Big Red “Shut the fuck up”
One more Nasty Woman:
Sabrina Erderly of Rolling Stone Magazine- woman who helped cook up Jackie Coakley’s fraudulent story and published it.
The troll life goes on doesn’t habeas blog up now.
Trolls are gonna troll