Tags
Commenter Fnu Mnu Lnu brought up an interestng point about the sometimes puzzling things women do. He says:
“…if a man has anything to his name, some woman is going to try and latch on to it.
Just go to the section of the walmart parking lot where the homeless people live. There’s one guy who works there that has been living is his car for over two years. Nice kid, very quiet and reserved, not too sharp, and not even enough incentive to get his expired drivers license back no matter how much I’ve tried to help him. He will still be living in his car years from now. And guess what,…
Some chick is trying to latch on to him!
Five or six spots east of him, are a homeless couple living in their version of a duplex. Him in his Acura, and her in her Volkswagen. Always parked right next to each other, with windows down and smoking cigs that he went to get at the store.
There is a tent city just off the highway and before downtown FredNeck, and guess what. It’s nots only got men in it. The bitches latch on to whoever they can!
When I used to work in the courthouse, I actually watched the judges issuing orders against men and forcing them out of their own tents for domestic violence. Can you imagine? Bitches can get you kicked out of the house you bought from goodwill with money you made panhandling!
As long as he has a dick and any sort of money at all, some bitch will try to latch on to him.”
I have also seen this in real life. Women attaching themselves to guys who have, as far as I can see, nothing to offer these women. So why do they do it?
Discuss… what’s behind this?
Notes From a Red Pill Girl 
Perhaps built in it is.
Maybe triggered when little resources one has
Hey! That shit’s copyrighted!!
See guys, another friggin example of a woman trying to latch on to some guys stuff! lol
You know I’m just kiddin. Copy away 🙂
Because there are no moral standards applied to the actions of women.
Legal standards are applied to women on an ad hoc basis…maybe.
At the end of the day there is no way for a man to enforce any contract voluntarily entered into between himself and a woman, verbal or signed. She can lie and/or cry her way into walking away from the deal with anything that she feels like taking. The police, the courts or just some random women/mangina/white knight on the street will automatically take her side.
All previous kidding aside, I think it may be due to a number of factors. Both individually or in groupings.
Some like the girl chasing the guy in the Acura, see a decent looking guy and with a bit of tweaking (not twerking) by her, can change him in to something else. Something “better” than she might otherwise find.
In the couple that lives in the duplex, she sees gas money, cigarettes, and free entertainment.
What surprised me, was the two tent people, who aside from an occasional trip to court, I would actually walking hand in hand all around FredNeck. I think they actually loved each other, because of how they acted most of the time.
But in all cases I think a huge part is simple feeling protected. And this is more pronounced with the poor. Women with money can afford a better place, better locks, etc. a woman with nothing feels incredibly vulnerable.
Actually see…
Interesting FML….
This comment from Ton brings up a similar situation of a woman making a puzzling choice. He says:
Hypergammy is not a linear equation
Which is probably half the confusion
I have a friend from my tier one days. One of the baddest mother fuckers ever born. One of the best men on God’s green earth.
His old lady left him for some loser with a bike, some tattoos and a couple of minor possession charges because she wanted a bad boy. Boggles the mind but to her pussy a low grade dope peddler was a better deal then the world’s most deadly boy scout.
That’s hypergammy on display in a wealthy nation when times are good. Russian brides marrying IT nerds is the other side for that coin
“Russian brides marrying IT nerds is the other side for that coin…” only shortly thereafter getting her green card divorces him for cash and prizes. PT Barnum was right, there is another one born every minute- suckers, all of them.
For the Bible believers… Man was created in the wildernis, woman was created in that pretty garden, not for her own sake, but for his sake.
Men live their lives for their own sakes, women find men to live with, hoping he will provide her with a garden (and life-sized doll house) 🙂
But in the case of a man who has nothing – he still has time, attention, a kind word to give. Loneliness is a killer. Also feeling and actually being protected. Homeless people disappear, sometimes. Scary, that is.
I cannot phathom why someone would leave the deadly boyscout for macho loser. Maybe they were sexually mismatched or something?
@ happyhousewifey; the deadly boy scout wears a veneer of civility that appears disingenuous in the woman’s eyes whereas the macho loser isn’t holding any false pretenses. She knows what she is getting. Also said by others here, she likes and prefers a fixer upper she thinks she can mold to her preferences.
I think that “alpha” is relative, not absolute.
Because the deadly boyscout has a strong internal moral code.
While the macho loser brings excitement through darkness.
Women see it as
strong internal moral code = safe, sterile, prudish, boring, no fun
excitement through darkness = unsafe, dirty, breaking all the rules, fun
I don’t get why a woman would pair up with a homeless guy when there are so many guys w stable jobs who are alone. I mean likely there might be drugs, dysfunction, etc. also involved but it seems the opposite of hypergamy to choose a guy w nothing (but very dubious/questionable potential and a bad boy vibe).
We’ve talked before how women can’t seem to tell a real alpha from a faux one, and that w/o a male family member screening suitors, many women are likely to choose poorly.
Thoughts?
As for the first question, I think you already answered it yourself by mentioning drugs.
As for the second, I’m not sure what you’re asking. Back in the day, when male family members used to screen suitors (long before my time) it is my understanding they screened for beta men. That’s why they grossly outnumber alphas in the population now and at least all of the 20th century. The modern world is maintained by beta men, not alpha in terms of SMP.
He’s an alpha in the homeless community. He’s got a 6 of natty daddy, four half smokes cigarettes he found on a sidewalk on east Patrick street, a sold four teeth in the top and seven in the bottom of his mouth, and gets at least $10 every time he panhandles on the exit ramp of I70 after each Frederick Keys Game.
He be pimpin well above the other guys in the highway culvert they all live in.
“left him for some loser”
A common mistake is to equate “badass” with “risk-taker”
Being a badass is attraction-neutral, being a risk-taker is hugely attractive.
I recall a SEAL being asked about being in a risky business, and his reply was emphatic. “We don’t do risk. You plan your dive and you dive your plan”.
Who takes the greater risk in a hostage rescue – the beat cop who may fire 5000 rounds in a career, or an SF trooper who fires 5000 per week?
The straying woman is not attracted to the loser per se, but to the risk-taking adventurous profligate genes of potential offspring. That possibility thrills her to her core. How many times do you hear a variation on “Gary was a total drop-kick, but I wouldn’t give up our kids for anything”.
Hypergamy exists because it works.
“Thoughts?”
If men cannot avail themselves to reason, why even attempt? It will only get worse with time.
A new post at Spawny’s there is
https://spawnyspace.wordpress.com/2016/11/04/help-or-hurt/
@ Saracen, very interesting! Thanks for adding that.
So was the world better off when patriarchy was matching daughters to betas? Did the alphas match up back in those days or what would they do? Or was it true alphas were approved but alpha cads (faux alphas) were chased off?
I am sure the fall of patriarchy and the fem imperative pushing to “make my own choices” was a big factor, negatively so. More women either left steady betas or paired up w faux alphas and ended up single parenting. The generations raised under the “new and improved” model were steered away from ideas of patriarchy and toward the fem imperative. W fewer dads at home or pushed out/not involved post split, there was no male to a teen suitors, advocate for a steady Eddie, discourage the flashy faux alphas. Not to mention neither girls or boys were being raised to be prepared for a successful marriage or to be marriage material.
Rinse and repeat, another generation removed from any memory of patriarchy or marriage for life or the old ways and…
The alpha of the Walmart parking lot is getting laid but the betas are not. A top special forces guy who is true blue gets dumped for a Harley mc bad boy…
The red pill rabbit hole goes deep…
* to screen suitors, not to teen suitors! Oops…
I assume that your “patriarchy” is that quaint custom of having a Dad/Husband at home, producing the least likelihood of partner violence and best outcome for the children.
I reprise a prediction on The Rational Male”
when the marriage rate dips to 35%,
when strong men simply refuse to have wives or LTGs of any stripe,
when 15% or more of men, strong or otherwise, hand-grenade their finances
or do indefinite jail-time rather than pay coerced child support,
when single mothers are universally looked upon with quiet contempt,
Only then will women as a voting bloc will contemplate .
abolition of Alimony.and Individual Child Support
The patriarchy is coming back,
but there will be a lot of screaming and finger-pointing first.
Someone said relatives screened suitors long before their time. That happened for me, and in my husbands family, too. And they weren’t screened for being beta males. Just to be suitable for the girl.
My husbands grandfather told all suitors of his granddaughters to keep them well under thumb (is that an expression in English? It means to keep them under control), because they weren’t meek ladies. He encouraged my husband to go for a foolish girl because he’s a bit serious himself, and he reminds me of that whenever I’m being foolish 🙂 (so that would be regularly)
My family favored my husband for being a few years ahead education-wise (I can’t respect dumb men, even when they are of great character, it’s a flaw but there you go) and his calm/reserved nature (I get anxious easily), and his friendly helpfulness (that compensates for the fact he can be a bit intimidating).
The other choice was a guy who had also skipped a few grades, and had a silly sense of humor that would offset my anxious nature, I guess he was beta but still alpha compared to me, I looked up to him a lot. Both were sure to want kids at some point, like me.
For my sister they looked for men who were lenient but a bit mean – she needs her freedom but cannot respect kindness (very unfortunate!)
So I don’t agree that families seek betas when they screen suitors. They seek men who compensate for the flaws in their women.
@happyhousewifey; we must be using diferent metrics for beta because I’m going by sexual market place standards of alpha fux beta bux, alpha plays beta pays. Provisioning is a beta trait, not alpha in terms of the sexual market place. Alpha gets the pussy for free, beta pays for it one way or another. Maybe back in those days people were more aware about the nature of women, but alpha they surely were not. Feminism was also not the omnipresent scourge then that it is today.
We live in a society that tells women they can’t survive without men. It’s as simple as that and the Red Pill movement is far from an exception. It’s not a line with one extreme on one end and one on another. It’s a circle. Either you’re too conservative and traditional and raise girls who are entirely dependent or you’re too liberal and raise girls who think they can just take what they want without earning it. We’ve yet to find a balance.
George, yes then it’s a matter of definition. I thought of alpha as the men you don’t say no to (the type who can make a demand and feel at ease, the ones who lead the family), and of beta as the men who don’t say no to you (the type who tremble when they try to demand, waver and go to the alpha for advice on everything).
“or you’re too liberal and raise girls who think they can just take what they want without earning it…” while claiming independence and yet still being dependent because Affirmative Action, Title IX, Alimony & Child Support, Sexual Harassment laws, and all manner of big daddy government sheltering her from cradle to grave. Hmmm, yeah women can survive without men. LoL
@ Belle, I would reapectfully disagree that woman can survive w/o man. Even women who live solo depend on a huge network of men to keep our safe civilization moving along. Electricity, clean water, gas at the pump, food at the store, garbage disappearing every week, sewer systems functioning, computer grids up, telecommunications, and so on.
Without men providing these things in a safe civilization, individual women would quickly realize how dependant they are on men, and on a man being in her life in particular. Women don’t face anarchy on thier own very well…
Men are needed. Always. It’s only an illusion created by the safe civilization they provide, ironically, that it seems that they are not.
* respectfully
Alpha Cads, Beta Cucks (but to keep the rhyme scheme and convenient polite euphemism, most people call them Dads)
Happyhousewifey, if you go over to Rollo’s most recent post and scroll down the comments to see posts from Scray and YaReally, all confusion will become clear.
https://therationalmale.com/2016/11/04/blue-pill-alphas/
@happyhousewifey
For a useful RP-centric vocab I recommend.
http://voxday.blogspot.com.au/2010/01/roissy-and-limits-of-game.html
Briefly (with apologies if wrong)
Alphas like to lead
Betas like to follow
Deltas don’t care who is leading as long as it is somewhere useful
plus a few other flavours.
Ok, something I have never fully understood about the red pill is why betas are so maligned? I mean, I get they need to not be blind to the situation, and mtgow is actually a sane way to respond to the sexual/marriage marketplace today, but why are these good and steady men so reviled by alphas? I also get it that alpha/top 20% guys see the most feral female behavior, is that why they pound on betas or is it just how alphas have always felt about betas?
Because they pressume that in getting the girls they must be superior. This is stuff that should have been left behind in high school. It is petty and vindictive and only succeeds in producing emnity.
I was on another thread tonight and I ran into someone that does not have a high opinion of what he called “chest thumpers”. I was beginning to think I was the only one. It was getting depressing.
Subjectively (to a non-beta) they induce cringe/scorn as they worship their goddesses. Objectively, they enable counter-productive behaviour in women.
What can you say about a judge who awards alimony to a woman divorcing her dutiful but cuckholded husband to co-habit with the biological father of her children?
There is a new post at Spawny’s
https://spawnyspace.wordpress.com/2016/11/05/paradoxical-confidence/
why are these good and steady men so reviled by alphas?
Beta men are not necessarily reviled by alphas. They are reviled by modern women in the era of unleashed hypergamy
This is the same thing I see in management theory. Its all about “Leadership”.
Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, Richard Branson all held up as what everyone above working shlep should aspire to. The Alphas of the business world. The equivalent of the Eisenhowers or Rommels or Pattons.
WRONG.
In Apple or Virgin there is the LEADER. Maybe even a dozen in the senior management team. The visionaries, the strategists.
Below them…..
Good, solid, competent MANAGERS.
People who can make decisions, prioritze, assign work, and follow up.
Not egoists. Not domineering. Not flashy. Just good solid people who know their shit, know what needs to be done a d just gets on with it.
High Betas or just Betas with some pride.
Just like combat. Too many captains playing generals. Yeah they die first. or get fragged. Its the experienced practical sargents the men folllow.
Part of the problem with business and society in general is this schism. Its either worker drone do as you are told or visionary charismatic leader (cue trumpets).
No one is Managing the day to day shit. Alphas and business Leaders hate that boring minutia. Check a budget, make a weekly schedule, order TG gases so the guys can weld??. Phuuaa!! I have ideas to envision and people(girls) to impress!!
How many businesses are adrift. Oh they have strategies and mission statements and envisioning camps. But actually get the product out the door on time, to spec and on budget. AHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahaa….sob sob. Oh yeah. I need that stuff.
Coincidence that the rise of sexy/charm is everything led to the over glorification of alpha and the focus on leadership resulting in nothing being managed?? All just spontaneously happened?? Social constructs not bleeding into economics??
Riiiiiight.
Ton, BV. You are combat vets like me. In a company of 1000 men how many flashy inspiring COMMANDERS do you need. (Colonels) 1? 2? How many good tacticians do you need to carry out the order of battle? 10? (Capts and LTs) How many solid, practical in the trenches leaders of men? 50 (Srgts and Chiefs)?
In business its called Directors, Managers and Foreman.
A good foreman is worth 4 times his weight in gold.
The average director…3 times his(often her) weight in manure.
Alphas have their place.
High betas and managers too
Betas who do the work.
and Dads
and Husbands
and….
But most aint flashy.
Farm Boy,
You are incorrect and the evidence is in the comments at Spawy’s Space to contradict you. However it is not true, natural alphas that harbor this attitude. It is the wannabes.
In the meanwhile, men have to compete for women, but hypergamy is making this moot. In a world where Angelina Jolie can dump Brad Pitt, it won’t matter how “alpha” a man is.
Totally off topic.
QUESTIONS FOR THE SINGLE INDEPENDENT WOMEN WHO DON’T NEED NO MAN
(Especially those who got the suburban house in the divorce)
Daylight savings time is a great time to check stuff
Did you reset all the clocks? Like the one in the basement on the water softener?
Check the batteries in the smoke detectors? Check their dates? After 5 years or so the smoke detecting chemicals degrade so they have power but are blind.
Check the flashlights? You have some right? Batteries? Havent leaked acid all over the inside?
Last nice weekend of the year. Gonna get cold soon.
So the holiday lights up? You know the ones on the roof?
Eaves cleaned up. You know up the ladder. Where the rainwater goes? If not over the winter water can back up under the roof and freeze lifting your shingles off the roof.
Put the lawnmower away? You put stabilizer in the gas tank right? If not the left over gas will turn to varsol or worse glue in the engine. Next spring its a rock.
Bring in that expensive patio furniture? Take down the gazebbo? Yeah its strong for summer rains but not made for snowloads. Gonna be a pancake by spring.
Oh and its gonna be a hard winter.
You have alternate heat like a propane heater or fireplace? All cleaned out and ready to go? Fuel/wood accessible. In a -10 blizzard and the power goes out your furnace wont light cause the electronics are down. Could be days.
Know where the shutoffs for water are? Pipes freeze or just back up. All of them? Each toilet, sink, tub, washer, hot water tank plus the main?
Fuse box marked? Have fuses? Know where it is? Plus the built in fuses on the furnace, stove, dryer, water pump.
And arranged for driveway clearing? No? Good with a snowblower? You did remember fuel stabilizer last spring (oh yeah that again)
Got spare shovels in case you break one.
Oh and snow tires?
oh and you live in an apartme t so the super does all this for you. Yeah in an emergency you and 200 other SIW in the building. Right.
But not to worry, you are a Strong Independent Woman. You got this.
Oh yeah, you don’t need no man so forget I (a man) reminded you of all this.
Too bad you dont have a husband to do allthat.
I did all that from 10 am until 4pm today.
Now enjoying a nice late lunch made by Mrs. as she sat reading a book under a blanket all cozy while I did all that. Toom 5 min to make the sandwich.
Mgtowhorseman made my head explode >.<
here’s one:
wonderme12.wordpress.com/2016/10/27/the-now/
this chick has been banging some guy for almost 2 years. her husband found out about it around a year ago. they have a young daughter, and they still live together. yet she is upset because he’s violated her privacy by checking her phone.
fucking really?
shes more worried about her phone, that what shes doing to her daughter and to her husband.
fucking cruel.
Have the Snip
Don’t marry
Don’t date single moms
FNU,
I think somebody has her priorities all kinds of mixed up. It is amazing the stuff that women get away with.
there really is no hope for this species.
FNU,
There should be hope. We have been on this planet for a long time and there are over seven billion of us. I think that we have been a little too tolerant in some areas and that has made some of us more than a little depressed.
Absolutely there is hope. Women are improving the breed, is all.
If men are too weak to hold on to their possessions, they are not worth breeding with.
That the man they are dispossess is their husband cuts no ice biologically.
Women are wired to hurt men if they are not manly enough. Evolution in action.
In 15 years this discussion will seem as quaint as flared jeans.
Saracen,
Women who would do that and think that way have no loyalty and are not to be trusted. In that sense, they are eliminiating themselves.
Whoah, my friend. They do not *think* that way, they *behave* that way, sometimes in great confusion as they do. Michelle Langley’s “Women’s Infidelity” has great examples.
If that is what men can expect, then we have an insurmountable problem.
“…is that why they pound on betas or is it just how alphas have always felt about betas?”
I personally don’t like the Alpha/Beta dichotomy. I prefer using red pill aware vs. blue pill true believers. But in terms of the sexual market place, Alpha or red pill aware despise/loathe the beta/blue pill true believers because of their exposure to women’s base/true nature. Blue pill average frustrated chumps in their naiveté are the thirstiest of SIMPS (Someone Idolizing Mediocre Pussy) h/t Tommy Sotomayor. my two cents.
just so I understand properly…
it’s OK for women to “behave” that way because it is part of their nature. yet men are expected to change their behavior from what is part of their nature, to something more PC and feminist leaning?
all women are really doing is to ensure that fewer and fewer men are willing to commit to them. there will be more single parent families, and society will continue it’s downward spiral. women are already not as happy as they used to be. I know quite a few divorced and single moms, and they do a great job of faux-happiness. but you sit down and talk with them, and at a certain point the wake up and realize that they really aren’t happy at all.
first they believed the myth of a fairy-tale marriage.
then they believed the myth of being a strong independent woman.
then they realized just how lonely that is, when it’s often too late to fix.
“all women are really doing …really aren’t happy at all.”
All true, and you are reinforcing my point. If this was self-aware behaviour, after the first dozen bad results the word would get around and they would stop.
women don’t think to
women don’t plan to
women don’t want to
They are WIRED to shun the weak and mate with the successful.
Hating the little darlings for this is hating a cat for having claws, and the inability to deal with this non-negotiable truth is the essence of Beta.
“…it’s OK for women to “behave” that way because it is part of their nature. yet men are expected to change their behavior from what is part of their nature, to something more PC and feminist leaning?”
“Lo and behold I saw a rider upon a pale horse, and all of hell came with him…”
Surely this will all end well. LoL
“Hating the little darlings for this is hating a cat for having claws, and the inability to deal with this non-negotiable truth is the essence of Beta.”
Nope, it’s hating the damn cat for not using the sandbox despite there being one in convenient locations for it to use. No excuses for that. As our resident LEO has said, women aren’t held responsible for their bad behavior, but we as men are held responsible for our bad behavior to the full extent of the law.
“women don’t think to
women don’t plan to
women don’t want to”
Yes, women don’t think or plan anything for shit. But, women want lots of things and are often found wanting more. MOAR!!!! Picture Lindy West pigging out on her candy corn OREA cookies.
its beyond that. men say something like “hey babe” and they get shunned for being sexist or a neanderthal.
women on the other hand can go and blow up a family and ruin their kids future, as in the example i gave above, and everyone feels bad for her because her husband looked at her phone without her permission.
fuck that noise!
wired to shin the weak and mate with the successful? thats not accurate. most of the time women seem to be trading down more than anything else. they are leaving their successful husband, and taking up with a loser with a few tats, and often are abusers.
the bad boys make their gash tingle, but are almost never as successful as the guy she already had.
“women on the other hand can go and blow up a family and ruin their kids future, as in the example i gave above, and everyone feels bad for her because her husband looked at her phone without her permission.”
Technically, it’s his phone because you know he’s the one paying for it. Seriously, how many women do you know out there paying for their own way through life let alone their own internet access? Yeah, her phone, LoL.
worse than that, a lot of women are now saying that “financial abuse is domestic violence”
can you believe that shit? that is an insult to every woman or man, that has ever been physically assaulted by a partner.
No different than Jackie Coakley UVA rape hoax whore, and Emma Sulkowicz mattress girl either and it will get worse.
It is bad enough that women treat betas as they do but, for manosphere “alphas” to compound it is beyond tolerance. There must be nothing as satisfying to them as stepping on people less fortunate.
GLA,
You may not be aware of it but Rolling Stone lost their lawsuit. Sadly, there is no point in suing Jackie Coakley because she doesn’t have a pot to piss in. The same holds for Emma Sulkowicz. Also, sadly, the suit Paul Nungesser was going to bring against Columbia for enabling and encourageing Emma was dismissed. There is no recourse to justice for men.
what about the guys at Duke a few years ago? what a bunch of crap the DA did. he should have punished much more harshly.
there is indeed a reason to sue her. at some point she will have money, and the people she abused can put liens against it.
Agreed, DA Nifong got slapped on the wrist with only having to resign from his office. He still works in LEO related industry. What a slimy turd he is. I don’t think he even had to pay any financial restitution to those boys. He got off way too easy.
*off the hook
I can see an issue with putting prosecutors in the general prison population. They would not last long. But, there has to be a place and method to punish them for their misdeeds. They are in a position to destoy any and all faith in the criminal justice system. Maybe one cetrally located prison reserved for them? Various states and provinces can lease the service?
they have no problems putting cops or agents in to prison. why should prosecutors get any different treatment? put them in the shu, and let them get what they deserve.
Horseman, no I have not done all that. Being able to sit under a blanket while someone does sounds mighty nice. Lunch is not so hard to make. Either is being nice and appreciative so hard to be.
Horseman, no I have not done all that. Being able to sit under a blanket while someone does sounds mighty nice. Lunch is not so hard to make. Either is being nice and appreciative so hard to be.
I am one for respecting privacy. I don’t dig in others phones and don’t expect them to look at mine (not that there’s anything to find) but I can see in that situation, she’s broken the trust. He’s smart to look.
I would agree w Sacramento and gal both. Women do have a built in program most are not even aware of or in touch with that can cause her to feel and act in ways she doesn’t herself understand. I hope that by bringing these things to a more concious level, women will start to recognize the hamster, hypergamy, shot tests, and so on and rather than simply going w the code stop to conciously think about things. I do believe women can choose NOT to be led around by her hamster but it takes self awareness and self discipline and the humbling realization that AWALT, on some level. In the past social conventions kept such things in check but with those now gone, it’s easier than ever for those things to cause damage. Women demanded the safety valves be taken off, and now they are governing their own fates, something many are not really equipped to do wisely and well. No matter what the hamster tells them.
Think of the story of Eve. Whether you believe it true or myth, it illustrates something about female nature. Despite having everything she could not follow the one rule, and was easily fooled into a choice that caused much suffering and angst not only for her and Adam (who followed along) but for generations to come. I see women destroy their own lives w bad choices too often. I wish they would stop and THINK.
Sacraren not Sacramento, darn autocorrect!
FNU,
The potential for abuse from a prosecutor has no end. They need to be subject to discipline. I am reading about too many things being brought to trial that a child could see were bunk. It is good to hear about the Pennsylvania AG but that is just a start.
RPG,
They wanted the safety valves off and they called the safety valves “Patriarchy”. They intended to break all the rules and never mind the consequences.
Fuzzie respectfully i think you are giving women too much credit. I think they saw the upsides of taking the safety valves off but they did not see the downsides of it.
Fuzzie, women are not very good at looking down the road they’re sort of living in the moment. I think most of the women who demanded the changes probably thought everyone would be better off for them. I don’t think they did it with malicious intent but they just did not understand that for every action there’s a equal and opposite reaction. Maybe some women did it maliciously but I think they more likely did it naïvely… Not that the end result is any different unfortunately…
RPG,
They went after the Patriarchy with hate and vengeance. They didn’t care that most of the rules were put in place for their protection and to allow society to thrive to the benefit of all. They did not care if they wrecked it.
RPG,
Radical feminists are vicious and vile, yet moderate feminists supported them. They let them start a gender war and approved it.
“… shot tests”? You mean shit tests. Oh by the way RPG, you ever been to Sacto? That place is a real shit hole full of hipster SWPL vermin as it is home to Apple Computer and Hewlett Packard and other tech nerd boondoggles. I would say it’s the California equivalent to Portland, OR or Seatle,WA. The left coast is just fucking insane really. When I think of Cuckmerica, I have that place in mind.
” I wish they would stop and THINK.” Well hell, I wish I could win the national powerball lottery, but that ain’t happenin’ anytime soon.
@ fuzzie I understand your anger, I do. Before I found the red pill, I was by no means a rabid feminist, nor a man hater by any means, but I was very niave about the impacts of feminism and progressivism in general. I actually believed then that these were steps forward to “equality for all” I accepted the female version of the blue pill. I did not see how the changes were actually hurting men, children, and even women. I honestly didn’t! It was like being a fish in a tank, not even seeing the water…. Of I could not see the damage or the downsides, I assume other women did not either. My friends and I never say around plotting how to bring down men. We were as clueless as blue pill guys thinking letting his girl have everything her way would lead to happiness. It’s hard to explain…. And yes there are some feminists who do hate men but even back then I rejected their extremism, did not see how I had become part of the problem. To most people I think most of this is invisible, they don’t stop to question if its good, or working, or better. They are just going along w the current social norms w/I much thought to how they are affecting everything.
RPG,
They sought to gain advantage and someone has to pay for it. Now, they have so much advantage that the marketplace is on the verge of seizing.
I now have enough stuff that I could shelter in place easily for 3 months. And a lighter, travel ready set up for 1-2 weeks, as well.
I know what a weirdo. But really, I have been slowly and steadily been working toward being emergency ready, may as well be ready now, right?
Be prepared and all that…
Nah, not weird at all. There is something in the air as of late. No one is really quite sure what it is, but whatever it is, it’s coming and it will be brutal.
RPG,
Do you want to change the subject? Maybe I can make one last statement. It is bad enough that most women hold men in contempt. What is getting to me is the number of men that agree with this. Maybe Horseman is right. All the men that can change a light bulb should pack it in on society.
@ fuzzie I don’t think in the most case it’s contempt, more like confusion… I really truly believe that most are unaware, confused. It is up to us who see to wake them up….
RPG,
I don’t think that they are confused. While the women you see coming to your blog are looking for answers, they are a handful. I think that most women would treat men like rented mules. It is something you pick up working with the public and especially with tourists.
” It is bad enough that most women hold men in contempt. What is getting to me is the number of men that agree with this. Maybe Horseman is right. All the men that can change a light bulb should pack it in on society.”
Those men already are and have been packing it in on society and are continuing to do so. MGTOW revolt will not be televised. As for the women that hold men in contempt, they are so strong and independent they can fend for themselves 😉
I was homeless with my husband, and spent plenty of nights sleeping in Walmart parking lots. I was receptive to his pursuit of me, vowed to spend my life with him, and loyally followed him into hell when our situation went bad — despite the number of people who kept telling me that I should leave him. Now he likes to brag on the politically incorrect boards about how he has the best wife ever. If you told him that I was “some bitch” who “latched on,” he’d make you regret it — he’s not a blue pilled, nu-male sissy.
Now excuse me, I have some sandwiches to make.
Flower of the woods,
It is nice to see someone taking their marriage vows seriously. Men don’t expect loyalty anymore.
Flowerofthewoods, your loyalty to your husband is quite admirable. In my experience, I haven’t met any loyal women. When I was in the military, there were many women being wives of servicemen who are the exact opposite of how you describe yourself. Same deal with wives of police and firemen. You are an exception to the norm.
@happyhousewifey
“My family favored my husband for being a few years ahead education-wise (I can’t respect dumb men, even when they are of great character, it’s a flaw but there you go)” Yeah, no woman ever seriously loves a Forrest Gump. Women who usually do go for stupid men are generally very manipulative and controlling, classic BPD, NPD, HPD.
betas are so maligned?
I want them to live better lives as men, which can only be achieved by becoming more masculine. Don’t much care if they turn super alpha and bang a million bitches or go their own way and ghost, but they will be better off if they reclaim their balls and sovereignty