Men live to oppress you!
Or that’s what they say, anyway.
And since we are talking taboos, I may as well add it only means “white men” but nobody says that because, duh, it’s obvious!
So really the message is, “White men live to oppress you!”
But do they? Really? Or are they a scapegoat? Just another group to “vilify” to take focus off of the real stuff. Like the world is basically an international s#it show, and getting worse by the day?
Or am I the only one seeing it that way? Is this utopia? Equality? Peace? Love? Rainbows? Getting along?
After 40 years of govt. support, are we there yet? If not, what is missing? Same for women’s rights? At what point will it be right? Never? Now? Someday?
What is the objective? To splinter apart with increasing hate, or to turn the page and realize for the most part none of us were even born then or if so, were certainly at best just a child and unable to change much?
Do humans need “a scapegoat?” Or can we evolve past that?
Please share your thoughts in the comments.
Notes From a Red Pill Girl 
Women who complain about being oppressed and held down by men haven’t been held down by the right man yet.
Women were created from man, for man, to be ruled by a man and serve him. We know that because God said “He shall rule over you.” That, contrary to feminists and churchians, is the “natural function of women.”
God also said that your desire will be for the man who is fit to rule you. AWALT. If a woman can find a man who is truly fit to rule her, it’s not that she’ll do just about anything for him, it’s that she will want to do just about anything for him.
😉
Women were created from man, for man, to be ruled by a man and serve him. We know that because God said “He shall rule over you.” That, contrary to feminists and churchians, is the “natural function of women.”
But we women should also be careful that the man we choose deeply appreciates such good traits and treats us with respect and high regard. It always makes me sad that there are so many How to comfort, nature, love , respect etc. your Husband books in the traditionalist corner but nothing that tells men how to do good things for women.
@ Artisanal
I am afraid you are wrong. Once I met a married woman mother of two children. In her own words hubby was very handsome, very masculine, dominant, so good in bed, professionally successful, “I like my hubby so much” she told me.
Well, she cucked hubby with me. I am not dominant (I am quite of a submissive), softie, have no much social skills, normal employee, no muscles, I have no car…
Bloody hell! Wives always cuck hubbies, doesn´t matter how alpha hubby is.
It has to be someone’s fault. Not something but someone. You cannot attack something.
I think industrialization was the beginning of our problems. As our world becomes more mechanical and computerized the problems multiply.
Prior to this period of advancement marriages were arranged for various reasons and were contractual. Religion helped keep things in order and laws were enacted based on religious mores.
If all lived up to their expectations. Men with honour providing for their families and women loyal to their provider and breeding with them made a fairly stable environment. But with industrialization work and the ability to provide started disappear. Add to that the disruption of two very large and bad wars which broke apart families and religion. Now there is no anchor and no one seems to want to forge a new anchor so we run amuck.
Rather than work together to create a new way we faction off and fight each other, each looking to be the dominant group. This will only lead us further into chaos.
The time has come to stop pointing fingers and start working together to put things back into order. It is women’s nature to want peace so I believe it is women who must make the first move toward a resolution.
But that is only my opinion and I am only one person.
“…but nothing that tells men how to do good things for women.”
I understand the feminist speech: “I don´t want to get married because I want my freedom. I want to travel, I want to party, I want to ride the CC, I do not want to do housewife work, I do not want to bear children, I want to sleep, I do not want to be opressed”, etc.
I undertand it so well.
Then… why the hell women who says all that things (which I agree, I insist) want to marry when they reach their early 30s? WHY? Why they want to be oppressed?
Dear Western liberated, libertine, feminist, career women… Why do you want to be opressed so bad?
Feminism cannot operate without a scapegoat and men who would be husbands and fathers are it. They leverage off women’s fear and convert it to hate. Then, they call it “empowerment”. This is all baffling to men because, we weren’t brought up to hate women. Being dependent on our mothers as children prevents that.
Maybe it is a good thing that feminism has encouraged women to hate men. It puts everything above the table and eliminates half measures. There is but one drawback, this isn’t going to work out too well for women.
RP, you JUST now getting that memo?? Of course all of us white men exist only to oppress you women…jeez, took you long enough to realize. All of that providing, protecting, loving and caring for women was a clever smokescreen to keep all of you women subjugated, barefoot and pregnant. Did we win?
@Iberian she should not have been talking with you, or alone with you, or putting her self in the path of temptation! Women need to guard themselves.
Iberian points out something that has currency among MGTOW forums recently. All relationships are temporary at the discretion of the woman. “She was never yours. It’s just your turn.” He really stands conventional wisdom on its head when he points out that her husband had greater SMV than he. My guess is that red pill wisdom isn’t perfect and needs a lot of refinement.
@ruhrgebietshexe
“But we women should also be careful that the man we choose deeply appreciates such good traits and treats us with respect and high regard. It always makes me sad that there are so many How to comfort, nature, love , respect etc. your Husband books in the traditionalist corner but nothing that tells men how to do good things for women.”
Bullshit. The fact there are so many books for *wives* on how to love their husbands means that it’s the wives who have so much trouble with this, not husbands. As Rollo Tomassi so succinctly puts it:
Iron Rule of Tomassi #6
Women are utterly incapable of loving a man in the way that a man expects to be loved.
In its simplicity this speaks volumes about about the condition of Men. It accurately expresses a pervasive nihilism that Men must either confront and accept, or be driven insane in denial for the rest of their lives when they fail to come to terms with the disillusionment.
Women are incapable of loving men in a way that a man idealizes is possible, in a way he thinks she should be capable of.
That’s Rollo Tomassi the rationalist looking at the PUA data and interpreting it with one glaring error: the assumption that men and women are equal. The error is actually a cultural ethos that says men and women are equal. That error is exposed in Genesis as a lie, because women were created from man, for man, to be used by man as his helper in order to accomplish his mission.
Look at the story of the Garden, in which Eve disobeyed God and ate of the fruit she was commanded not to eat. Why isn’t what she did considered to be the first sin? Why is it that it wasn’t until Adam ate of it that sin entered the world?
Adam knew that God had said that in the day you eat of it, you will surely die. Knowing that he knew that Eve was a dead woman and Adam said to hell with his command, to hell with his responsibilities, he violated his orders and decided he’d die with his woman rather than accomplish his mission.
What we can see is that in His judgment, God declared women to be incompetent and placed them under the authority of men, specifically a husband. “He shall rule over you.” When I say “incompetent” I’m speaking in the legal sense, as in women are incompetent and need a guardian to look after them. Don’t believe it? Read Numbers 30 and see the rules for the guardianship husbands and fathers have.
@Iberian
It isn’t that I’m wrong, it’s that your interpretation of data points is incorrect. Just to go by the story you told I can think of multiple reasons the wife might have done that, first and foremost being that she didn’t have enough comfort. She was so full of alpha that she needed some beta comfort and you got tapped. Second, she wanted to hurt her husband so instead of picking a man who was superior to him, she picked you. She probably used you to try to hurt him by hitting him in the ego.
Regardless of the need, in general, the formula is RM+RT+RP+RL (the right man at the right time in the right place with the right line). That formula is generally all it takes to “magically” get any woman’s legs to spread. Seriously, any woman. The idea is that for the right man a woman will do just about anything and the rest is removing impediments. Yes, all women are like that and we know that because the Bible tells us so:
In Ecclesiastes we hear of the Teacher searching for a virtuous woman. In verse 7:28 he says: “while I was still searching but not finding– I found one upright man among a thousand, but not one upright woman among them all.”
Women who are wise would need only establish a few rules that prevent these conditions from being met to protect themselves from themselves, but the natural arrogance of women and their own desires to seduced cause them to refuse to accept restrictions on their behavior.
Of course, I could address all this from the data of the dreaded “PUA’s” but what’s the point? God’s word says it all if one knows where to look and understands what it says.
@ Artisanal, I think you are right. She was always talking to me about hubby, and not with disdain but admiration. Non stop. It didn´t bother me but payed my attention. So, now I am sure she used me to punish hubby and -cooking her cake and eating it- she used hubby to punish me. What a warped mind!
@ RPGal
LOL. 🙂
So oppressive, you [white] men!!!
“Can’t breathe….oh the oppression!”
RPG,
Feminists are reading and they may take you literally. LOL
They wanted to kill marriage and all possible relations between men and women. They have done a great job.
I do love oppressing people; oppressed women are well behaved women.
Oppressed minorities are well behaved minorities
Both of which allow White men to enjoy peaceful lives
“Can’t breathe….oh the oppression!”
Normally I’d point out that ladies shouldn’t talk with their mouths full, but since you’re typing… carry on…
There is a new post at Spawny’s
https://spawnyspace.wordpress.com/2017/01/11/series-on-sluts-part-iii-what-is-a-slut/
I am a nice guy who loves bad girls.
Getting back to the original post, I don’t think that men are out to oppress women. But, what would be nice is a little peace and quiet around the house. Tranquility is in short supply.
LOL some of you guys are too much.
Sue,
You haven’t seen us when we turn silly, yet.
I think a large of what constitutes identity requires us to have an opposition identity, which becomes naturally the out-group. Even liberal ideologies that deny differences between sexes will instead set borders between those who are “woke” and those who are “bigoted”; this effectively creates a new group to attach identity to and people to reject.