Tags
battle of the sexes, culture, family, feminism, modern woman, politics, red pill, society, women's rights
Hello all, I am still very busy with real life projects but all is going well, GREAT in fact! 🙂
So to keep things going, here’s a video from Marion Le Pen (the even more outspoken niece of Marine Le Pen, who is running for the leader of France) and her take on feminism. Watch. Consider. Discuss.
Do you think she is right? Too much? Not enough? Please share in the comments!
Notes From a Red Pill Girl 
For Marion,
I do have a slight idea of how deep feminism is in France. It is illegal for a father to check his paternity through DNA testing. Feminists want this and government must be afraid how deep this goes.
That room she is giving her speech in looks pretty fucking empty. I only counted about 12 people when the camera panned to the side. Comments on youtube are comparing her to Joan of Arc.
“Do you think she is right? Too much? Not enough?”
Too little, too late. France like Germany and the rest of western Europe is truly fucked. It can only get worse.
George,
That took place in the National Assembly. There are 577 seats.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Assembly_(France)
I would love to see someone in Congress take feminism to task. It may be political suicide, or it may be overwhelmingly popular.
I hope that it is not too late.
@ fuzzie; I imagine civil war will break out before that happens. I could be wrong, but it is what it is. If it doesn’t, what we will get is present day South Africa the way things are going.
Even if civil war broke out, I don’t think anything would change much. Remember those white feather cunts in WW2 who sent countless men to die for no reason other than they didn’t like said men? Yeah, I’m sure we will see much of that return.
life as an idealistic blue pilled young man:
I hope not, but if government is part of the problem, it may come to that.
life after red pill:
@ fuzzie; interesting times nonetheless.
You reminded me of FEMEN. When it all hit the fan in the Ukraine, they had disappeared. I think there were other reasons for it, but feminism and serious conflict would not mix.
If I may paraphrase:
“It is coming to a straight-up choice between Islam and Patriarchy (government getting out of the child-support business), and you are cowards for not acknowledging this.”
This young lady is in for an interesting life. I wonder if she is not breaking ideological ground for her aunt. Kudos.
As a person who lives very close to France…
Marion´s speech shows the paradoxes we are living: a tradcon Catholic movement like Front Nationale is defending feminism as a French way of life against… Islam.
I said that in January: Europe progressives and consercatives have to fight together against Islamization. That fight will be under the flag of populist Right.
Said that… I think there is a different prospective on feminism in the US and Europe.
In Europe is more about women naked on the beach and women shagging around like there is no tomorrow. Women are the new gays (regarding promiscuity).
It seems in the US feminism is more about raping hubby in Court.
Regarding Brexit…
Brits are wrong if they think the massive third world inmigration they are facing since decades has to do with the EU. It has nothing to do with the UE, it has to do with the Commonwealth.
They were wrong voting “out” and they know it. Now Prime Minister is trying to make a deal with the EU that keeps the UK in the UE but unofficially.
If only feminism in the US were about women going naked on the beach. I think what they have done is to tap into women’s fear and turn it to hate.
http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/news/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/christie-blatchford-family-court-advice-for-men-from-one-whos-made-it-through&pubdate=2017-03-31
Anyone wanna challenge THE reason for mgtow?
That this was in a national paper indicates the powers that be are getting scared. they dont know what is happening but they know its not good.
Horsemen,
How long can they continue to attack the portion of society that produces? They thought they could do it forever.
I found this on YouTube. Enjoy.
This is going worldwide. We do owe Hillary a debt for calling us all “Deplorable”. Coming from her, it is a mark of honor.
A new post at Spawny’s there is
https://spawnyspace.wordpress.com/2017/04/01/fried-ice/
A new post at Spawny’s there is
https://spawnyspace.wordpress.com/2017/04/03/why-do-they-do-it/
I’ve said here several times that I believe most middle aged single women in the US these days are mentally ill. Someone just posted a vid on youtube which shows it in all its glory. A hot guy … displaying a little PDA with a hot girl … and the ugly, potty mouthed, FATTY goes wacko inside a restaurant. All caught on video of course. Yep … lots of these wackos running around these days … something about not having a hubby, not having a boyfriend, not having any kids, getting older and older and fatter and fatter. They walk around hot men who treat them like they don’t exist … and it drives them crazy.
Mega,
Stuff like that is going to be all over YouTube as more and more women find out that a husband or a boyfriend is not in the cards for them. This one went off over a public display of affection, while she waits for her meal for one to be prepared. Could it be that she resents that other people can have sex?
I can see, in the not too distant future, cats coming up to my door, asking to be let in, presenting cards saying that they have run away from their female humans and need asylum.
I think BBW is right. A restaurant is not a nightclub. Probably the couple were both exhibitionists.
“Get a room, dogs!” LOL.
Iberian,
i have to wonder how far a couple of kids will go in a brightly lit take out sushi restaurant. It would not be my first choice for a make out session. Any way, that woman went far beyond “Get a room!”.
Wags on the internet are having all kinds of fun with this.
Maybe another video stirring up French national pride?
Don’t know if anyone has been following the tale of me and the new GF. Don’t post too much about it (maybe too much) and usually its late and I’m drunk, lol. But at least I tell the truth. Anyway we went away last weekend for a 3 day weekend. Most we’ve spent together so far 24×7 for 3 days. Sex was good about what we normally have each weekend so I think she was a tad disappointed but she knew why. (hint: eating bad food and getting an upset tummy doesn’t make you too amourous, lol).
Anyway, we drove several hours away. Stayed 2 nights in a hotel sharing a bed. Ate out, went to activities … kept busy but not too busy. For 3 days … was nice. We sure get along great. So … on the way home … we stopped for gas … a little ways out of town. And I noticed a change in her … she was upset about something. We switched and I let her drive for awhile and she said something that I picked up on and the light went on. She didn’t want to go home. She didn’t want to go back to her life. She wanted to go home with me. I didn’t say anything and I know she’s going thru a hard time … but dang … she’s so miserable … she wants to throw her life away and become part of mine. Kinda neat. But kinda scary ! So I said nothing and decided to mull it over.
So why does she hate her life ? Well she was married for a LONG time and is used to sharing responsibilities … most women don’t want to be RESPONSIBLE. Part of taking the red pill is learning this. That fact, isn’t right and isn’t wrong … it just is. Women don’t like to be in charge. So she now is running the household alone. One kid still at home. Kind of fuckup … but not too bad in the big scheme of things … she tries to be a good parent but the kid and mostly society isn’t cooperating. She has another kid 1/2 way out … but his stuff and his pets are still at her place. Along with her pets. And, yeah, we talked … why is she taking care of the kid’s dog ? Means she’s got to confront him over it, of course. And she’s got a stressful job and some changes there. And bills. She has the RESPONSIBILITIES … ALL OF THEM.
When she comes over to my place and when we are together the responsibilities are gone. I take the lead and make decisions for both of us. FOR BOTH OF US. She trusts me and it works. We’re both happy. We enjoy being together. The sex is great. We get along great. No games, no pressure, we just both get to be ourselves. It works. Till she has to go home to face reality again.
She just sent me an email where we talked about the vacation. She admitted … “I did not want to leave you …”. In other words … she didn’t want to go home afterwards. That’s the thing about getting along so good; I already knew. Nice that she could admit that, though. Actually … its great sign that she said that. Not sure how to respond and haven’t yet. We both have some big changes in our lives coming up over the next couple of months. Will be interesting to see how it all works out.
I think that she likes you.
The key to keep a healthy relationship with any woman is letting her inner slut be.
Let the bitch fuck around thanks to Tinder and you fuck around thanks to Escorts backpage. Everybody is happy.
Monogamy is not healthy. Open relationships are better.
Iberian … sorry to disagree with you but I will. Wanna know the difference between human beings and animals ? Monogamy. The father sticking around after conception, after birth. The family unit. Father, Mother, children.
Monogamy is completely natural and like most of human behavior … baked in via genetics. Unfortunately, hypergamy is part of the female nature and is VERY difficult to control. Women can’t do it … at all, look at our current slut culture. The truth is most men can’t either. ENTER CULTURE. Yep, culture, society, shaming, religion, morals, norms, values, and in many cases these norms were codified in Law … acceptable behavior. Mostly this was a regulation the behavior of women … but also to a lesser degree, men.
What we are seeing today is a breakdown in Culture and the norms that regulated behavior. Specifically women’s behavior … but again, to a lesser degree, men’s. We have seen a breakdown in control of women and hypergamy has been unleashed without any controls. The legal system has be hijacked into a weapon to punish men, steal their wealth, and reward women for bad behavior or at the very least … hold then NOT ACCOUNTABLE.
Its not that marriage or monogamy is wrong … it isn’t. ITS JUST WRONG RIGHT NOW UNDER THE CURRENT CONDITIONS. Just cause that is wrong right now and most men should NEVER, EVER get married today … does not mean that Open relationships are better. Or work. Or are normal. They are not. Acting like an animal where one Alpha male has a harem of females and most other males end up with nothing … IS NOT THE WAY TO HAVE A SUCCESSFUL SOCIETY. Ditto with every male sleeping with every female he can land and every female sleeping with every male she can land. Might be fun while you are young. And if you are attractive. People don’t stay you. People want to have families. Even if you are attractive today … one day you will get old and the game of seeking sex will grow old … and then you’ll just be alone.
Monagamy and marriage is a horrible deal for men today … but Open Relationships are probably worse over the long term. IMHO.
Mega,
In addition to the investment needed to raise offspring, there are so many huge differences between human and animal sexuality that it is not a good idea to compare except for very limited circumstances.
I have to agree that lifetime hard monogamy is the best answer yet for society and civilization. However, at this point in time, women are going to veto that notion and alpha males are going to second it. That is going to leave most men to conclude that Eve was fine for Adam because she couldn’t apply hypergamy or branch swing.
Agree fuzzie. Always reminds me of the logic of those that argue for Open arrangements and letting Alpha’s have harems … leaving betas with nothing. And its this … see if you follow. If the above was “typical” or “normal” or even “common” … why is it that Alphas are only a small number of men … some say 20% of men … but most that know … say its more like 10% or even 5%. So … if Alphas dominate access to women … what is it that only 10% of men are Alphas … all those babies of Alphas … over time … why does their genetics not take over ???
The logic follows. If Alphas do take over and monopolize access to women and make no mistake, many women would be OK with that. If 95% of men end up with NO ACCESS TO WOMEN and the Alphas are at the top … again if you look at the situation … those men, Alphas, are NOTHING WITHOUT BETAS TO SUPPORT AND FOLLOW THEM. Think the FB quarterback … Mr Alpha QB … he can do NOTHING without an offensive line to block for him. Or receivers to catch. Or runners to run. Or a DEFENSE to keep them in the game. What happens when the BETAS REFUSE TO GUARD AND PROTECT THE ALPHA. When they turn on the Alphas and take them out.
Yeah .. the Alpha goes down … and in pre-historic times … along with his offspring. The betas … take control of society and establish THEIR RULES. Rules which ensure equal access for all men. One women per one man. Hypergamy is reigned in and women ARE NOT ALLOWED CHOICE; because if they are allowed choice … they will make the wrong choice. Society is structured that way. Morals. Values. Religion. All set up to grant equal access to woman and favoring monogamy and restricting hypergamy. Set up to favor the Family Unit … maximizing the output of children on to further generations … this is what is successful … 95% of children are the from Betas … not Alphas.
Hope that makes sense.
There is a study that is making the round on the internet about how 4000 to 8000 years ago, there was a genetic bottleneck. For every male reproducing, there were 17.2 females reproducing. There is lots of speculation, but no evidence for the reason behind it. I think it coincided with the dawn of agriculture. Found it.
https://psmag.com/8-000-years-ago-17-women-reproduced-for-every-one-man-6d41445ae73d
I do have to agree. Without the support of betas, alphas are going nowhere. For that matter, so is civilization.
Fuzzie … I had read something like that too and frankly find it hard to believe. There have been some stories recently coming out about the Sciences and about how it isn’t about the Scientific Method at all anymore. THAT .. I do believe and think its been that way for decades … probably as long as Feminism has been around (2nd wave) and getting progressively worse. Most anthropologists, biologists, geneticists probably also believe in Global Warming and Feminism is about Equality. Probably co-teach in Gender Studies and believe in Safe Spaces and Triggering is a real thing. Brainwashed libtards all of them.
I did take a course in Cultural Geography in college and was amazed when one of the students asked a prof about “how come humans don’t have any close genetic relatives ???” … You know like Cats have domestic cats, bobcats, leopards, panthers, jaguars, lions, tigers, cheetahs, etc. They prof got this dumbfounded look on his face … and she “that’s really a mystery … nobody really knows ????”
All while current humans kill others seeking the same resources, kill others who don’t have the same color of skin, kill others who don’t have the same beliefs, kill others who have a different form of government, kill others who have a differ religion, etc, etc, etc. Why doesn’t humankind have any close relatives still alive ? Well, duh, we wiped out the competition.
Anyway, if such a thing did occur (what you brought up) I would chalk it up to 2 things: War and disease. Lets same there was a huge war going on and all the able bodied men were sent off to something … like say the Crusades. And while the men were gone (or didn’t return) … a disease hit or famine or something. Say 70% of the men are gone and disease wipes out 1/2 the remaining population you’d be down to a small number of men and a much larger population of women … and the ones that remain … would do what men and women do … procreate. Harems ? Yeah … could see something like that happening in such a situation.
Mega,
you too have added to the speculation. Still, a few guys could deal with 17.2 women. I doubt that all could. How could the average guy feed that many?
Fuzzie … don’t think you understood what I was saying. Lets say that there was a major war and essentially all abled body men between 15 and 40 were sent away to fight. Remember this is ancient times … 15 was considered a man then. Most men didn’t live to 50. Now imagine these men get wiped out and never return and the tribe is left on its own. 20 women for every man. WHY WOULD MEN PROVIDE FOR WOMEN IN THAT SITUATION ???
So it ain’t up to men to feed women. Or support women. Or provide for women. With such few men available … men would have 2 jobs: Provide leadership … make decisions and second … help make babies. Yep provide sex for the women. And literally that would be what it is … stud service … he may have a wife or two or five … but he’d provide “services” on behalf of the tribe so other women could have children. OTHERWISE the tribe would be facing extinction.
So you got it backwards. In that sort of situation … women would be supporting men … not men supporting women. And while you might think it would be a sexual bonanza for men … think about it realistically. Imagine your job … ALL THE MEN REMOVED .. and all the women fighting like cats/dogs and acting like children. You are the only man to provide leadership and keep the peace. A fun job ??? NOT LIKELY
And I think we are officially OFF TOPIC, lol.
Just a little bit off topic. RPG won’t mind. We’re being respectful.
I did miss your point. But, the scenario you described would be local. The 17.2 to 1 that I described was worldwide.
Yes, I would go nuts, or go fishing a lot.
A new post at Spawny’s there is
https://spawnyspace.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/young-sheilas-be-a-good-long-term-bet/
RPG,
I think we need a post. It has been a while.
Linny,
Are you out there? Please tell me that you’re not hunting wabbits.
Happy Easter!